From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Remove unnecessary code from psql's watch command |
Date: | 2024-03-08 17:09:12 |
Message-ID: | 859741.1709917752@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:03:39 -0500
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't have Windows here to test on, but does the WIN32 code
>> path work at all?
> The outer loop is eventually exited even because PSQLexecWatch returns 0
> when cancel_pressed = 0. However, it happens after executing an extra
> query in this function not just after exit of the inner loop. Therefore,
> it would be better to adding set and check of "done" in WIN32, too.
Ah, I see now. Agreed, that could stand improvement.
> I've attached the updated patch (v2_remove_unnecessary_code_in_psql_watch.patch).
Pushed with minor tidying.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2024-03-08 17:12:20 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-03-08 17:08:38 | Re: Call perror on popen failure |