| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: threads stuff/UnixWare |
| Date: | 2004-05-13 14:35:09 |
| Message-ID: | 8596.1084458909@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> I agree. the only issue is how to set up our makefiles to only do the
>> -Kpthread/-pthreads(gcc) flags on the client code, and not do it for
>> the backend itself.
> I think mixing a pgport that has thread flags with a backend that does
> not is more risky than just compiling everything with the same thread
> flags.
Can we get this straight: is -Kpthread a compile flag or just a link flag?
If the latter then it should not be needed in building the libpgport files.
If the former then adding it to LDFLAGS is the wrong thing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-13 15:07:21 | Re: threads stuff/UnixWare |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-13 14:04:05 | Re: threads stuff/UnixWare |