Re: FW: statement failure

From: "Little, Douglas" <DOUGLAS(dot)LITTLE(at)orbitz(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL General (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: statement failure
Date: 2013-03-07 16:33:30
Message-ID: 8585BA53443004458E0BAA6134C5A7FBB6BEB000@EGEXCMB01.oww.root.lcl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

both dev and prod are 8.2.15
Version string PostgreSQL 8.2.15 (Greenplum Database 4.2.2.4 build 1) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.4.2 compiled on Oct 3 2012 20:28:56

can you tell me what change in 8.3 maybe Greenplum incorporated some of the changes in their build.

Thanks

From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 9:47 AM
To: Little, Douglas
Cc: PostgreSQL General (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] FW: statement failure

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Little, Douglas <DOUGLAS(dot)LITTLE(at)orbitz(dot)com<mailto:DOUGLAS(dot)LITTLE(at)orbitz(dot)com>> wrote:
Hi,

I have a dev and prod Greenplum system (4.2.2.4) that is based on PG 8.2.15
I have a function that's been working fine on dev, but when implemented in prod had a syntax error.
I was easily able to fix by casting, but I can't see why the message didn't show up on our dev machine.

can you double check pg version on both dev and prod. My guess is that prod is 8.3+ -- casting rules were tightened with 8.3.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Little, Douglas 2013-03-07 16:42:51 Re: table dump function
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2013-03-07 16:05:13 Re: table dump function