Re: Schema partitioning

I generally would separate different apps into different schema.

doug

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of David Johnston
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:20 AM
To: Charlie
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Schema partitioning

On Sep 1, 2011, at 14:13, Charlie <scorpdaddy(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Could I get feedback from the community on schema partitioning?
>
> I'm doing maintenance on my ddl and I'm noticing that my tables are all in 1 schema, but they have prefixes on their names like table_app1_sometable, table_app1_secondtable, table_app2_anothertable, table_priviledged_restrictedtable1, etc. The table_app1 tables seem to want to go in their own schema "app1", etc, and drop the prefixes. Except they'll still be there, as in app1.sometable.
>
> Is this just style? Or are there concrete benefits to partitioning?
>
>

Mostly style but some ease-of-use when it comes to permissions as well. It's really no different than why you'd use sub-directories in your OS instead of putting everything in C/root.

It does give you namespaces features as well (I.e., duplicate names but in different contexts).

David J.