Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]
Date: 2008-09-03 22:57:57
Message-ID: 8582.1220482677@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I guess I would ask, "Who else would we be targeting this for?". DBAs
> seem to be the only logical choice.

Regular users look at pg_settings too, you know. Maybe *you* only
get questions from DBAs...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message M2Y 2008-09-03 23:02:14 Conflict resolution in Multimaster replication(Postgres-R)
Previous Message Joshua Drake 2008-09-03 22:43:36 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code