From: | Denis Kirjanov <kda(at)itsirius(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Denis Kirjanov <kda(at)linux-powerpc(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexey Zhuchkov <alexey(at)itsirius(dot)su> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] sepgsql: prohibit users to relabel objects |
Date: | 2015-04-30 08:13:50 |
Message-ID: | 857759077.307154.1430381630482.JavaMail.zimbra@itsirius.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oh, I wasn't aware of that.
Any hints where to look at?
Thanks!
PS: sorry for top posting.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Denis Kirjanov" <kda(at)linux-powerpc(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Alexey Zhuchkov" <alexey(at)itsirius(dot)su>, "Denis Kirjanov" <kda(at)itsirius(dot)su>
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:01:36 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] sepgsql: prohibit users to relabel objects
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Denis Kirjanov <kda(at)linux-powerpc(dot)org> wrote:
> Enforce access control on security labels defined by admin
> and prohibit users to relabel the objects
Really? Why? I would think it's the policy's job to restrict relabel
operations.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-04-30 08:15:46 | Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-04-30 07:59:54 | Re: Minor improvement to config.sgml |