From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | jhatfield(at)g-s(dot)com(dot)au, "'PostgreSQL Admin News'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: select * from pgadmin_users; causes error |
Date: | 2001-02-23 22:04:25 |
Message-ID: | 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A29C9@woody.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 23 February 2001 21:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: jhatfield(at)g-s(dot)com(dot)au; 'PostgreSQL Admin News'
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] select * from pgadmin_users; causes error
>
>
> Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > Basically it isn't so much as the user ID that created
> > the views that is an issue, it's that fact that pgAdmin
> then didn't issue a
> > 'GRANT ALL ON pgadmin_users TO PUBLIC'.
>
> The particular case being complained of here would not be
> fixed by that.
>
What exactly was the problem? I must have missed an earlier part of the
thread as I don't read pgsql-admin - I barely get time to read ODBC &
Interfaces :-(
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-23 22:28:34 | Re: select * from pgadmin_users; causes error |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-02-23 21:38:27 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance |