RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Cedar Cox'" <cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-14 10:17:46
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A299B@woody.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cedar Cox [mailto:cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com]
> Sent: 14 February 2001 10:48
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: 'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
>
>
>
> > > > Surely just a copy of the full installshield installation
> > > on the ftp server
> > > > would suffice (and wouldn't exactly eat disk space!).
> > >
> > > Where would one get the source for this "unsupported" driver?
> > > (..not that
> > > I care). Being open source software, I'd hate to see
> something binary
> > > only..
> >
> > CVS? It's just an older version after all.
>
> I was thinking more along the lines of a source tarball on the ftp
> server..
>

I can't see that being a major problem to produce.

Regards,

Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cedar Cox 2001-02-14 10:48:29 RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-14 08:45:45 Re: [ODBC] ODBC <6.4 protocol