RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cedar Cox [mailto:cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com]
> Sent: 13 February 2001 21:17
> To: 'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
>
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com]
> > > Sent: 12 February 2001 14:31
> > > Cc: PostgreSQL odbc list
> > > Subject: [ODBC] Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
> > >
> > >
> > > How feasible is it to break the two drivers separate and put
> > > the driver and
> > > code with 6.3 and back under "quarantine". People can still
> > > get it if they
> > > need to, but it is no longer being supported.
> > >
> > > I am not sure how much that confuses things.
> > >
> >
> > Surely just a copy of the full installshield installation
> on the ftp server
> > would suffice (and wouldn't exactly eat disk space!).
>
> Where would one get the source for this "unsupported" driver?
> (..not that
> I care). Being open source software, I'd hate to see something binary
> only..

CVS? It's just an older version after all.

Regards, Dave.