RE: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'The Hermit Hacker'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: 2001-01-18 08:05:40
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A289E@woody.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org]
> Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
>
>
>
> After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking for
> opinions ...
>
> Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> the ODBC and
> JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> made, so that we
> have:
>
> pgsql-interfaces-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> - ODBC related discussions
>
> pgsql-interfaces-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> - JDBC related discussions
>
> pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> - libpq, libpq++, python, tcl

Sound good to me. I do seem to end up wading through a mass of JDBC stuff
which is of no interest to me (nothing personal Peter!).

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oscar Serrano 2001-01-18 09:02:39 RE: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Previous Message Ken Wright 2001-01-18 07:27:41 Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...