Re: bulk typos

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Félix GERZAGUET <felix(dot)gerzaguet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bulk typos
Date: 2018-04-01 19:03:50
Message-ID: 8562.1522609430@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix_GERZAGUET?= <felix(dot)gerzaguet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> I needed another distraction so bulk-checked for typos, limited to
>> comments in *.[ch].

> I think you introduced another one while changing "explcitly" to
> "expilcitly" instead of "explicitly" :-)

LGTM for the most part, except for this change:

- * Therefore, we do not whinge about no-such-process.
+ * Therefore, we do not whine about no-such-process.

I think that spelling is intentional, so I didn't change it.
Pushed the rest, with Felix's correction.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-01 19:07:47 Re: bulk typos
Previous Message legrand legrand 2018-04-01 18:29:28 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements