Re: pgsql-server: Add: > > * Allow buffered WAL writes and fsync > >

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Add: > > * Allow buffered WAL writes and fsync > >
Date: 2004-08-14 03:15:39
Message-ID: 856.1092453339@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Add:
>> * Allow buffered WAL writes and fsync
>>
>> Instead of guaranteeing recovery of all committed transactions, this
>> would provide improved performance by delaying WAL writes and fsync
>> so an abrupt operating system restart might lose a few seconds of
>> committed transactions but still be consistent.

Who exactly signed onto this as a good idea? It sure doesn't square
with my ideas of an ACID database. Committed means committed, not
"maybe if you're lucky committed".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-14 03:23:40 Re: pgsql-server: Add: > > * Allow buffered WAL writes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-14 01:30:55 pgsql-server: Add: > > * Allow buffered WAL writes and fsync > >