On Mon, 2023-10-16 at 20:32 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 08:56 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > We need to be careful about precise terminology. "Valid" has a
> > defined
> > meaning for Unicode. A byte sequence can be valid or not as UTF-
> > 8.
> > But
> > a string containing unassigned code points is not not-"valid" as
> > Unicode.
>
> New patch attached, function name is "unicode_assigned".
I plan to commit something like v3 early next week unless someone else
has additional comments or I missed a concern.
Regards,
Jeff Davis