From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More SSL crash woes |
Date: | 2008-04-08 21:33:10 |
Message-ID: | 8531.1207690390@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com> writes:
> Now their are 2 subscriber nodes that connect to this node for slony
> replication...
> One is running the same version (libssl 0.9.8e) but one is running
> 0.9.7e-p1 2.
> could this be an issue?
Seems unlikely, that would mean that openssl failed to preserve a
compatible on-the-wire protocol across versions ...
> Is there something wrong with the way we build/install libssl?
That's what I'm suspecting at this point, but I've got too little
acquaintance with the Solaris world to guess what it is.
One idea: you are linking to /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so, but is
it possible that when you compile PG it is finding the header files
for some other version?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Amiel | 2008-04-08 21:56:30 | Re: More SSL crash woes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-08 21:26:57 | Re: Cannot use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "postgres"" |