Re: More SSL crash woes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More SSL crash woes
Date: 2008-04-08 21:33:10
Message-ID: 8531.1207690390@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com> writes:
> Now their are 2 subscriber nodes that connect to this node for slony
> replication...
> One is running the same version (libssl 0.9.8e) but one is running
> 0.9.7e-p1 2.
> could this be an issue?

Seems unlikely, that would mean that openssl failed to preserve a
compatible on-the-wire protocol across versions ...

> Is there something wrong with the way we build/install libssl?

That's what I'm suspecting at this point, but I've got too little
acquaintance with the Solaris world to guess what it is.

One idea: you are linking to /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so, but is
it possible that when you compile PG it is finding the header files
for some other version?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Amiel 2008-04-08 21:56:30 Re: More SSL crash woes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 21:26:57 Re: Cannot use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "postgres""