From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tablespaces |
Date: | 2004-03-03 04:59:55 |
Message-ID: | 8520.1078289995@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I was trying to be paranoid about users who have multiple postmasters on
> the same machine and want to share a table space while both systems are
> live. There'd be no mechanism to test for that situation if we didn't have
> something like a postmaster.pid file. Is this being a little too paranoid?
Hm. AFAICS there is no safe situation in which a tablespace directory
could be shared by two different installations (== toplevel $PGDATA
directories). I don't think we need a dynamic postmaster.pid-type lock
to protect them. What might make sense is some sort of marker file in a
tablespace directory that links back to the owning $PGDATA directory.
CREATE TABLESPACE should create this, or reject if it already exists.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-03 05:00:40 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 04:55:03 | Re: Out of space situation and WAL log pre-allocation (was Tablespaces) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-03 05:00:40 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-03-03 04:46:55 | Re: Tablespaces |