Re: branching for 9.2devel

On May 1, 2011, at 9:34 PM, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Generally the last week only has 1-3 patches open
>
> The last CF I managed the end of the third week looked like this:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg00334.php
>
> That is, we had 15 patches still pending out of 72 submitted:
>
> 9 ready for committer
> 1 waiting on author
> 5 needing review
>
> If you want to view it as a *commit* fest, that is really 15 to go.
> If you're viewing it as a *review* fest, those six broke down:
>
> 3 were patches submitted by committers (1 of which was WIP)
> 1 other was WIP
> 1 was down to tweaking docs
> 1 got a review the next day, showing it wasn't ready
>
> So we either need to markedly increase the pace of CFs (which is
> hard without more reviewers unless we provide "brisker" review and
> kick things back a lot faster) or we need to stop thinking that the
> goal is to get them *committed* during the CommitFest; but I thought
> that was kinda the point.

+1.

...Robert