| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
| Subject: | Re: open items for 9.4 |
| Date: | 2014-09-29 18:44:42 |
| Message-ID: | 8506.1412016282@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The items I see are:
> - Remove xloginsert_slots/xloginsert_locks GUC - Not yet!!
> The text seems to indicate that there's some disagreement on this
> point. I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not to keep the
> GUC, but if we're going to remove it it should probably happen before
> beta3. It's going to be impossible to remove once we've released with
> it, I suspect.
The lack of any documentation for the GUC (neither in config.sgml or
postgresql.conf.sample) suggests very very strongly that it was not
meant to be shipped. If we don't remove it I will certainly insist
that it be documented adequately.
Personally I think a hardwired #define should be plenty. What's the
argument that users will need to tune this at runtime?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-09-29 18:46:20 | Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-09-29 18:30:01 | Re: open items for 9.4 |