From: | Amitabh Kant <amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Juan Pereira <juankarlos(dot)openggd(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
Date: | 2009-03-20 06:42:32 |
Message-ID: | 84b68b3d0903192342n1148e8f5v9ecd0adcc00c31c3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Just to add to this list, I have been using Postgresql to store data
for multiple GPS applications handling more than 150-200 vehicles.
Some of the tables that I have are running into 20 - 25 million rows
at the max, and on average 10 million rows. I am yet to see a problem
from the database side, although must admit that I receive data every
10 seconds from the devices.
I am sure that optimizing the postgresql.conf files, and using postgis
would be of great help down the road.
With regards
Amitabh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Juan Pereira | 2009-03-20 13:11:06 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-03-20 01:37:35 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2009-03-20 07:39:27 | Re: Maximum transaction rate |
Previous Message | ray | 2009-03-20 04:08:53 | Re: Installation Error, Server Won't Start |