From: | Jamie Koceniak <jkoceniak(at)mediamath(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #12050: Orphaned base files |
Date: | 2015-03-05 03:55:05 |
Message-ID: | 84CE67AB46ACDA41B18094177DD0853D308735@ORD2MBX04H.mex05.mlsrvr.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
If I don't remove the orphaned files, is there any change that Postgres could use the same file node (oid) again?
For example, say file node 2602351127 doesn't exist anywhere in pg_class, could Postgres use that same file node id again?
What would happen in that case?
Thanks,
Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 6:59 PM
To: Jamie Koceniak
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #12050: Orphaned base files
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jamie Koceniak <jkoceniak(at)mediamath(dot)com> wrote:
> Is it safe to remove the files /postgresql/9.1/main/base/31858 directory?
The general rule is usually the following if you do not want to corrupt your system: do not mess up manually with those files and let the system manage it. Be sure to at least take file-level backup if you go down this dangerous road.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-05 06:37:23 | Re: pg_upgrade failure on Windows Server |
Previous Message | Venkata Balaji N | 2015-03-04 22:26:26 | Re: [BUGS] Truncate cascade doesn´t work with BDR |