Re: PostgreSQL DBA in SPAAAAAAAACE

From: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr>
Cc: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Joe Miller <joe(dot)d(dot)miller(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL DBA in SPAAAAAAAACE
Date: 2011-12-24 21:39:40
Message-ID: 84AEF30B-07F2-4500-8E1D-995C3711F1FF@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 24 Dec 2011, at 18:03, Vincent Veyron wrote:

> Maybe you're right, it must be trap (just kidding, Joe).

Perhaps those SQL server and Oracle DBA's were considered to be too expensive to put in such a volatile contraption and they opted for the free dude instead.

But yeah, I'm surprised he/we won too. I consider it a compliment :)

Alban Hertroys

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2011-12-24 23:21:51 Re: PostgreSQL DBA in SPAAAAAAAACE
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2011-12-24 21:32:17 Re: postgresql triggers - defining a global resource (java)