From: | "Hakan Kocaman" <Hakan(dot)Kocaman(at)digame(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Ray Stell" <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu>, "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jim Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Raul Retamozo" <revelar(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL |
Date: | 2006-09-25 15:18:19 |
Message-ID: | 84AAD313D71B1D4F9EE20E739CC3B6ED013DEC07@ATLANTIK-CL.intern.digame.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
hi,
yep :~)
compiled from source on Suse 9.2 (not SLES 9)
best regards
Hakan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Ray Stell
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 5:03 PM
> To: Scott Marlowe
> Cc: Jim Nasby; Raul Retamozo; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] best OS and HW for postgreSQL
>
>
>
> I'm curious about the "[ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4" thread
> as it applies to this thread. The COPY thread pointed to kernel
> issues in x86_64 GNU/Linux SLES 9. I'm wondering if x86_64 is not
> a good move for pg servers at this time. Are there happy x86_64
> production deployments?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:44:32AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > >
> > > In general, you're probably best off running whatever OS
> you're most
> > > comfortable with.
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-25 15:28:20 | Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL |
Previous Message | Ray Stell | 2006-09-25 15:02:40 | Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL |