Re: recovery from xid wraparound

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Shane Wright" <shane(dot)wright(at)edigitalresearch(dot)com>
Cc: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery from xid wraparound
Date: 2006-10-24 14:23:19
Message-ID: 8474.1161699799@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Shane Wright" <shane(dot)wright(at)edigitalresearch(dot)com> writes:
>> Just make sure you've really covered *all* the system tables.

> I've been under the impression system tables get done first, then
> user(me)-created tables after -

No, there's no such guarantee. A database-wide vacuum just does the
tables in the order it finds 'em in pg_class.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Wright 2006-10-24 14:28:45 Re: recovery from xid wraparound
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-24 14:08:23 Re: recovery from xid wraparound