Re: [BUG] false positive in bt_index_check in case of short 4B varlena datum

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Zhilin <m(dot)zhilin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [BUG] false positive in bt_index_check in case of short 4B varlena datum
Date: 2024-03-21 05:46:43
Message-ID: 846B49D1-4657-4C2D-956F-DFC2A90BDDA1@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> On 20 Mar 2024, at 15:24, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Right, the patch number 0003 looks wrong to me.

Indeed, step 0003 was added to the patchset after entry marked RfC. And you are right that it’s not ready yet, and, honestly, I do not know how to fix it properly.
Let’s proceed with other bugs and patches in this thread, and for bug of the step 0003 we will create separate thread later.

Thanks for working on this!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2024-03-21 13:51:25 Re: FSM Corruption (was: Could not read block at end of the relation)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-03-20 22:26:26 Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded