From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mikko <mhannesy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
Date: | 2010-02-25 23:32:05 |
Message-ID: | 8452.1267140725@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Where are we on this issue?
According to my files, I complained about the extreme ugliness of the
patch (redefining strdup for pete's sake) and the fact that it did not
actually do things anything like the LC_TIME code as was claimed.
Hiroshi rejected those criticisms. I don't know where we are, but
I don't want to see this patch applied in this form.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-25 23:33:29 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-25 23:21:58 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-25 23:33:29 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
Previous Message | Karl Schnaitter | 2010-02-25 23:30:36 | Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables |