From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug in pg_restore with EventTrigger in parallel mode |
Date: | 2020-03-09 18:59:35 |
Message-ID: | 8445.1583780375@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Which, TBH, makes me wonder about the validity of the original complaint
>> in this thread. I don't mind delaying ET restore as long as we feasibly
>> can; but if you have an ET that is going to misbehave during restore,
>> you are in for pain, and it's hard to consider that that pain isn't
>> self-inflicted.
> The proposed patch solve the original complain. I was just trying to
> understand completely what you pointed out before and I agree with you.
> Thanks for the clear explanation.
OK, thanks for confirming that this solves your issue in practice.
> About the patch LGTM and IMHO we should back-patch it to all supported
> versions.
Done.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-03-09 19:04:23 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-03-09 18:47:54 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |