Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-07 17:32:03
Message-ID: 84437ca82810679edc04c0d620158875@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> However, HS is already in the tree, and HS without SR is a whole lot
> less compelling than HS with SR. So it's going to be pretty
> unsatisfying if we can't get SR in there.

I don't think that's the case. Having HS alone would be a huge win,
and the sooner we can get it out there the better. Those that are
waiting for SR might have to wait one more version, but my intuition
tells me that's a small minority compared to those waiting for HS.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001071231
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktGGoMACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj74ACgmjeQgRIAncQiCeQ5aaEeWI3y
UHMAoOFWsCldiRzC0GJygwDdYXLGjE4O
=YAwK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-01-07 17:32:25 Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-07 17:24:10 Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling