From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: modular pg_regress.sh |
Date: | 2006-07-19 02:52:02 |
Message-ID: | 8429.1153277522@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> writes:
> I propose a patch to make pg_regress.sh more modular.
This patch has been pretty thoroughly superseded by the recent rewrite
of pg_regress in C. It's possible that we could modularize the C
version, but what I'd like to know first is why you can't just use
pg_regress as-is. If it's short a small feature or two, perhaps adding
those would be the way to go.
> The patch also adds a new option, --listen-on-tcp that makes the server
> listen on the tcp port even when unix sockets can be used.
I believe this is not necessary: just set --host='interface to listen on'.
> There were two issues I noticed with the old script:
> ...
These are good simplifications, which I've incorporated into CVS HEAD.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 03:24:08 | Re: Progress bar updates |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 02:46:04 | Re: pg_regress in C |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 03:32:34 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 02:46:04 | Re: pg_regress in C |