Re: Question About Native Support for SQL:2011 Temporal Tables in PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Lynam <davidlynam1(at)hotmail(dot)co(dot)uk>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question About Native Support for SQL:2011 Temporal Tables in PostgreSQL
Date: 2024-11-23 19:14:27
Message-ID: 842239.1732389267@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 6:23 AM David Lynam <davidlynam1(at)hotmail(dot)co(dot)uk>
> wrote:
>> Are there any plans or discussions about adding native support for
>> SQL:2011 temporal tables, so we don’t need extensions?

> No concrete plans I've heard of (but see below).

See this long-running thread:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2024-11-23 19:19:09 Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2024-11-23 18:57:16 Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10