Re: Cygwin linking rules

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cygwin linking rules
Date: 2018-09-29 22:25:37
Message-ID: 841a3474-212a-2b2e-b19a-9c0a233441d1@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/29/2018 04:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Not sure where to go from here.
> What would happen if we stopped building libpq.a, so that the
> linker didn't have any choice about what to do?
>
>

I will test Marco's patch, which I think does that, tomorrow.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-09-29 23:07:29 Re: Implementing SQL ASSERTION
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-09-29 22:20:56 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting