From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ferruccio Zamuner <nonsolosoft(at)diff(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Unable to identify an ordering operator |
Date: | 2000-12-31 17:17:19 |
Message-ID: | 8413.978283039@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Ferruccio Zamuner <nonsolosoft(at)diff(dot)org> writes:
> select persons.name,firm.name,persons.tel
> from persons,work,firm
> where (persons.table_owner=0) and
> (work.id_firm=firm.id and work.id_person=persons.id)
> union
> select persons.name,firm.name,persons.tel
> from persons,work,firm
> where (persons.table_owner=1) and
> (work.id_firm=firm.id and work.id_person=persons.id);
> ERROR: Unable to identify an ordering operator '<' for type '_text'
UNION is defined to eliminate duplicate rows, so it has to be able to
sort and compare rows, which means it needs < and = operators for each
selected column's datatype. Evidently one of the name or tel columns
is declared as array of text ('_text' means text[]), for which there
is no '<' operator. You could probably make one if you were intent
on it (see contrib/array for some inspiration). A lazier way out is
to use UNION ALL, which doesn't try to eliminate duplicates.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albert REINER | 2000-12-31 21:29:33 | Arrays |
Previous Message | Ferruccio Zamuner | 2000-12-31 14:55:12 | Unable to identify an ordering operator |