From: | João Eugenio Marynowski <joaoem(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: table corrupted |
Date: | 2009-10-24 22:17:19 |
Message-ID: | 840f304c0910241517w4577b4efiebe2e1ecb2cfa4d8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/10/23 João Eugenio Marynowski <joaoem(at)gmail(dot)com>
> I thought this would solve my problems but not yet ...
> the block that I found is not presenting error...
> find_bad_block
> ----------------
> (514708,16)
> (1 registro)
> blockId / blocks_per_chunk = 514708 / 131072 = 3,9269104
> base/21058/21271.3
> chunk_block_id = block_id % blocks_per_chunk = 514708 % 131072 = 121492
> is attached the result of pg_filedump -if -R 121492
> /var/lib/postgresql/8.2/main/base/21058/21271.3
> Even then I filled the block with zero
> But when I run again the find_bad_block it show one block before, ctid
> 514707, and then, 514706 and I stop...
> Any suggestion and explication?
>
> --
> João Eugenio
>
I fond manually a record with error (462813,13) and zeroed it and the BD
work ok only with 18 register lost that will be recovery from old backup.
The function find_bad_block (
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-07/msg00506.php )
don't work for me, anybody know why?
Thanks for now!
--
João Eugenio Marynowski
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-24 23:16:30 | WIP patch: EvalPlanQual rewrite |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-10-24 21:33:06 | Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql |