Re: pgAdmin v4.1 - positive feedback

From: Jack Royal-Gordon <jackrg(at)pobox(dot)com>
To: Richard Brockie <richard(dot)brockie(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgAdmin v4.1 - positive feedback
Date: 2019-01-20 19:54:24
Message-ID: 83E135C2-9223-4811-A04A-288F57B13C05@pobox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

Thanks for your post, Richard. Like you, I looked at pgAdmin 4 a couple years ago. I decided then that it wasn’t ready for me, so I went back to pgAdmin III. Your post convinced me to go back and take another look. I only just loaded it, but my immediate impression is far more positive. I’m not one of those who trashed the developers for the choices they made, I know that building something like this takes time and will involvd some unfortunate decisions that are nevertheless difficult to backtrack on. I’m happy to see that the project has moved forward to where it is at now. I will be evaluating it in the coming days and weeks hopefully.

Thanks,

Jack

> On Jan 20, 2019, at 10:31 AM, Richard Brockie <richard(dot)brockie(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've subscribed to this list specifically to give this positive feedback!
>
> Like many others, I shared the initial disappointment with the early pgAdmin 4 releases. Things improved greatly when pgAdmin 4 started using the default system browser, and now moving to v4.1 from v3.6 yesterday, I'm very pleased to say that I find I am enjoying using pgAdmin again!
>
> Thanks & best wishes,
> --
> R.
>
> Richard Brockie
>
> Real-time bicycle race management - www.ontheday.net <http://www.ontheday.net/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message François Valenduc 2019-01-20 20:23:13 Re: KeyError: 'browser.forgot_password'
Previous Message Richard Brockie 2019-01-20 18:31:57 pgAdmin v4.1 - positive feedback