From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |
Date: | 2022-03-16 21:09:35 |
Message-ID: | 839181ab-5edb-d696-f888-458099f2d09d@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/16/22 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I don't have problem with the use of SETTING. I think the
>> meaning is pretty plain in context and unlikely to produce any confusion.
> I'm just unhappy about the disconnect with the documentation. I wonder
> if we could get away with s/configuration parameter/setting/g in the docs.
>
>
I don't think we need to fix that here though. If you can live with
SETTING for now I will undertake to fix the docs post-feature-freeze if
necessary.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zheng Li | 2022-03-16 21:17:18 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-16 20:53:02 | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |