Re: Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dan Wolfe <dkwolfe(at)pacbell(dot)net>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups?
Date: 2004-09-25 03:30:47
Message-ID: 8380.1096083047@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I just received this from someone about Google archiving being
> terminated. Seems amazing but I checked Google and it seems true.

Yeah, I noticed that last night --- they seem to have shut it off as of
the 16th or so. We should probably tell people about this on all the
mail lists and encourage complaints.

>> Thank you for your note. It seems that these groups are no longer
>> archived. Typically when a group is tagged as 'no longer archived' it is
>> because it is a duplicated group or does not have substantial traffic.

I can't believe either of those claims.

Where does one complain to, exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] 2004-09-27 14:40:56 PostgreSQL on CXOtoday.com but for good reason
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-09-25 03:03:23 Re: Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2004-09-25 10:13:55 Re: search.postgresql.org
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-09-25 03:03:23 Re: Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups?