From: | Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj(dot)sf(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Partition column should be part of PK |
Date: | 2021-06-25 03:10:07 |
Message-ID: | 836265572.4593017.1624590607279@mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
we have some partitioned tables with inherence and planning to migrate them to the declaration.
Table DDL:
CREATE TABLE c_account_p
(
billing_account_guid character varying(40) NOT NULL,
ingestion_process_id bigint NOT NULL DEFAULT '-1'::integer,
load_dttm timestamp(6) without time zone NOT NULL,
ban integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT billing_account_pkey PRIMARY KEY (billing_account_guid, ban)
) PARTITION by RANGE(load_dttm);
When I try the create table, it's throwing below error:
ERROR: insufficient columns in the PRIMARY KEY constraint definition
DETAIL: PRIMARY KEY constraint on table "l_billing_account_p" lacks column "load_dttm" which is part of the partition key.
SQL state: 0A000
Is it mandatory/necessary that the partition column should be a primary key? cause if I include load_dttm as PK then it's working fine.db<>fiddle
If the partition column should be supposed to be a PK, it's challenging to create a partition by range with the date column, cause the load_dttm column chances to have duplicate if data loaded COPY or INSERT.INSERT INTO c_account_p SELECT * from c_account_p_bkp ON CONFLICT (billing_account_guid,ban,load_dttm) DO UPDATE SET 'some stuff..'
If I receive billing_account_guid, ban combination with different load_dttm then it will end up with duplicate keys.
Could some please help me to understand this scenario?
Thanks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-06-25 04:22:28 | Re: Partition column should be part of PK |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-21 00:17:31 | Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms) |