From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages |
Date: | 2009-06-19 16:12:50 |
Message-ID: | 8355.1245427970@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Thursday 18 June 2009 23:15:53 Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, as far as that particular point goes: maybe we could fix the tools
>> issues underlying this, but I'm tempted to think that it's not worth the
>> trouble, because making these man pages be aliases for SELECT is just
>> the Wrong Thing anyway. I think we should just split them off and have
>> them be documented as separate top-level reference pages.
> Umm, the reason why it is that way now is that you did not want them to be
> separate top-level man pages:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/19886.1226171409@sss.pgh.pa.us
Well, at the time I thought that WITH would only be a sub-clause of
SELECT. The idea that we might allow it to be attached to INSERT etc
causes me to revise my opinion a bit. Do you have a preference one
way or the other about how to do this?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2009-06-19 17:49:31 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-19 16:03:13 | Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1 |