| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: On disable_cost |
| Date: | 2024-10-05 16:05:25 |
| Message-ID: | 835219.1728144325@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'd encourage anyone else on the sidelines who has an opinion on how
> to display the disabled-ness of a plan node in EXPLAIN to speak up
> now, even if it's just a +1 to something someone has already written.
> It would be nice to see what more people think.
FWIW, I do not like the current display one bit.
I think "Disabled: true" on only the nodes that are themselves disabled
would be a very substantial readability improvement.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alena Rybakina | 2024-10-05 17:29:50 | Re: On disable_cost |
| Previous Message | Roberto Mello | 2024-10-05 15:56:51 | Re: New PostgreSQL Contributors |