Re: FunctionCallN improvement.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: a_ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FunctionCallN improvement.
Date: 2005-02-01 01:09:01
Message-ID: 8351.1107220141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 23:38 +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
>> (b)Define the macro that initialize FunctionCallInfoData, and use it
>> instead of MemSet in all FunctionCallN, DirectFunctionCallN,
>> OidFunctionCallN.
>> This macro is the following.
>>
>> #define InitFunctionCallInfoData(Fcinfo, Flinfo, Nargs) \
>> do { \
>> (Fcinfo)->flinfo = Flinfo; \
>> (Fcinfo)->context = NULL; \
>> (Fcinfo)->resultinfo = NULL; \
>> (Fcinfo)->isnull = false; \
>> (Fcinfo)->nargs = Nargs; \
>> MemSet((Fcinfo)->argnull, 0, Nargs * sizeof(bool)); \
>> } while(0)
>>
>> I think that plan(b) is better, because source code consistency
>> and efficiency improve.

> I agree; I think the macro is a nice improvement to readability.

But a dead loss for performance, since it does a MemSet *and* some other
operations. What's worse, it changes a word-aligned MemSet into a
non-aligned one, knocking out all the optimizations therein.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-02-01 01:38:55 Re: Last ID Problem
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2005-02-01 00:58:42 Re: Last ID Problem