Re: UW 713UP3 patch

--On Sunday, November 02, 2003 22:26:40 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Larry Rosenman writes:
>
>> Since peter objects to my methods, what is an ACCEPTABLE way to detect
>> the 7.1.3UP3 compiler?
>
> One POSSIBLE way to do this properly is to write a test that
>
> 1) Uses $CC, $CFLAGS, and related variables rather than hardcoding 'cc
> -O'.
>
> 2) Names any test files conftest.*, so configure cleans up automatically.
>
> 3) Doesn't execute any compiled programs. See the __FAST_MATH__ test for
> an example.
>
> However, I still think that we should not bother testing for this.
> Considering that the condition first occurred a couple of months ago and
> is already fixed, this isn't a big issue. Think about what would happen
> if we had to develop and maintain fixes for every buggy GCC compiler every
> released.
The problem is MOST people will **NOT** be able to get the fixed compiler
as it's on the Upgrade Pack path (PAY FOR), and **NOT** the Maintenance
Pack path (Free).

I'll try and write the patch as you suggest.

> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749