| From: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
| Date: | 2021-09-10 02:26:10 |
| Message-ID: | 8344F83B-D20F-420C-B4F1-BEB3C9232654@amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On 9/9/21, 7:03 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> As far as the behavior is documented, I'd be fine with the approach to
> keep the code in its simplest shape. I agree that the message is
> confusing, still it is not wrong either as we try to query a run-time
> parameter, but we need the lock.
That seems alright to me.
Nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Smith | 2021-09-10 02:49:52 | Re: Is there anyway for non-superuser to log all sql statements at the session level? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-10 02:03:05 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-09-10 02:33:16 | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-10 02:03:05 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |