Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, selkovjr(at)mcs(dot)anl(dot)gov, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures
Date: 2001-01-19 15:17:46
Message-ID: 8336.979917466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> Wouldn't a -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib have helped?

Well, yeah, but how would we know to do that? The fact that gcc is
searching /usr/local/lib is completely unknown to configure.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-19 15:29:15 Re: Re: Changes to include files
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2001-01-19 15:09:59 Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures