Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2023-07-12 08:24:45
Message-ID: 831f17ba-ff36-1380-a475-a7cd2c65a89c@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.07.23 03:03, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> Here are some new patch files based on discussions from PGCon.

Here are a few fixup patches to get things building without warnings and
errors.

The last patch (your 0005) fails the regression test for me and it
didn't appear to be a trivial problem, so please take another look at
that sometime. (Since it's the last patch, it's obviously lower priority.)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0002-fixup-Add-temporal-PRIMARY-KEY-and-UNIQU.patch.nocfbot text/plain 1.8 KB
v12-0005-fixup-Add-UPDATE-DELETE-FOR-PORTION-OF.patch.nocfbot text/plain 3.3 KB
v12-0008-fixup-Add-PERIODs.patch.nocfbot text/plain 4.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-12 08:26:31 Re: 'ERROR: attempted to update invisible tuple' from 'ALTER INDEX ... ATTACH PARTITION' on parent index
Previous Message Masahiro Ikeda 2023-07-12 07:59:22 Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions