From: | Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan |
Date: | 2018-07-12 10:45:47 |
Message-ID: | 83191da0-afe8-03fd-f496-c2c08e072612@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/07/12 18:12, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2018-07-10 12:01 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
>
> On 23.01.18 17:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > attached updated patch
>
> This appears to be the patch of record in this thread. I think there is
> general desire for adding a setting like this, and the implementation is
> simple enough.
>
> One change perhaps: How about naming the default setting "auto" instead
> of "default". That makes it clearer what it does.
>
>
> I changed "default" to "auto"
>
> updated patch attached
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
Hi Pavel,
I tested your patch on 40ca70eb.
Here is the result.
=======================
All 190 tests passed.
=======================
Thanks,
Tatsuro Yamada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-12 10:45:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" test pending solution of its timing is (fwd) |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-07-12 10:42:31 | Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump |