From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions |
Date: | 2013-07-19 16:33:02 |
Message-ID: | 8307.1374251582@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> if (lockmode == AccessShareLock)
> aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> ACL_SELECT);
> + else if (lockmode == RowExclusiveLock)
> + aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> + ACL_INSERT | ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
> else
> aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
Perhaps it would be better to refactor with a local variable for the
aclmask and just one instance of the pg_class_aclcheck call. Also, I'm
pretty sure that the documentation work needed is more extensive
than the actual patch ;-). Otherwise, I don't see a problem with this.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-19 16:39:17 | Re: Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-19 16:29:33 | Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow |