Re: Am I in the same transaction block in complex PLPGSQL?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Durumdara <durumdara(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Am I in the same transaction block in complex PLPGSQL?
Date: 2022-03-11 15:01:12
Message-ID: 830175.1647010872@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Durumdara <durumdara(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In autocommit mode, when I start a simple update or select, it is one
> transaction, so if something fails, the whole modification is rolled back
> (there is no "half update", or "only first record updated").
> What will happen with complex statements, like PLPGSQL stored procedure, or
> trigger?

It's one transaction unless you take steps to make it something else.
In plpgsql, you can make "sub transactions" with BEGIN/EXCEPTION blocks
(an exception rolls back only side-effects that happened since BEGIN).
Or, if it's a procedure not a function, you can explicitly COMMIT
what's been done so far, and then your next action starts a new
transaction. But without such measures, all actions executed by
a function are part of the same transaction as the calling statement.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Durumdara 2022-03-11 16:24:27 Re: Am I in the same transaction block in complex PLPGSQL?
Previous Message George Woodring 2022-03-11 14:48:45 Re: foreign key on delete cascade order?