| From: | Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Page Checksums |
| Date: | 2012-01-24 07:57:21 |
| Message-ID: | 82fwf5353y.fsf@mid.bfk.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Treat:
> Would it be unfair to assert that people who want checksums but aren't
> willing to pay the cost of running a filesystem that provides
> checksums aren't going to be willing to make the cost/benefit trade
> off that will be asked for? Yes, it is unfair of course, but it's
> interesting how small the camp of those using checksummed filesystems
> is.
Don't checksumming file systems currently come bundled with other
features you might not want (such as certain vendors)?
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jesper | 2012-01-24 08:02:28 | Re: Page Checksums |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-24 06:59:57 | Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches |