From: | mark <markkicks(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
Cc: | Justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] select query takes 13 seconds to run with index |
Date: | 2008-05-27 14:46:05 |
Message-ID: | 82fa9e310805270746u56334348m34055cb31219ff45@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:22 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
<depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:32:50PM -0700, mark wrote:
>> >> EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from pokes where uid = 578439028 order by id
>> >> DESC limit 6;
>> > The estimate is way off, when was the last time Vaccum was on the table?
>> about a week ago i ran this VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE;
>> this table is never updated or deleted, rows are just inserted...
>
> 1. boost default_statistics_target
> 2. run analyze more often - daily job for example
> 3. create index q on pokes (uid, id); should help
OK I did this
ALTER TABLE pokes ALTER uid set statistics 500;
ALTER TABLE
ANALYZE pokes;
ANALYZE
and then it became super fast!! thanks a lot!!!
my question:
-> is 500 too high? what all does this affect?
-> now increasing this number does it affect only when i am running
analyze commands, or will it slow down inserts and other operations?
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from pokes where uid = 578439028 order by id
desc limit 6;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=467.80..467.81 rows=6 width=134) (actual
time=0.016..0.016 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=467.80..468.09 rows=117 width=134) (actual
time=0.016..0.016 rows=0 loops=1)
Sort Key: id
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Index Scan using idx_pokes_uid on pokes
(cost=0.00..465.70 rows=117 width=134) (actual time=0.011..0.011
rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: (uid = 578439028)
Total runtime: 0.037 ms
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-05-27 14:52:22 | Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-27 14:41:50 | Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2008-05-27 14:58:19 | Re: [GENERAL] select query takes 13 seconds to run with index |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2008-05-27 08:22:01 | Re: [PERFORM] select query takes 13 seconds to run with index |