Re: simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

From: mark <markkicks(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tomasz Ostrowski" <tometzky(at)batory(dot)org(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1
Date: 2008-04-01 12:59:41
Message-ID: 82fa9e310804010559v69b8c5ekb14b582558de6dec@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Tomasz Ostrowski <tometzky(at)batory(dot)org(dot)pl>
wrote:

> On 2008-04-01 09:44, mark wrote:
>
> > I already am running 8.3.1 [ i mentioned in subject].
>
> But I have no experience on anything with more than 1GB of RAM...
>

Should I reduce shared_buffers to less than 1GB? If that is going to improve
performance, I certainly can do it. I somehow assumed allocating more
shared_buffers is always good..?
thanks

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Brooks 2008-04-01 13:00:31 Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-04-01 12:42:34 Re: BUG #4078: ERROR: operator does not exist: numeric = character varying