From: | Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc |
Cc: | "Robert Treat" <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, "Jim Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Aidan Van Dyk" <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Koichi Suzuki" <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Page Checksums |
Date: | 2012-01-24 08:16:46 |
Message-ID: | 82bopt347l.fsf@mid.bfk.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I would chip in and say that I would prefer sticking to well-known proved
> filesystems like xfs/ext4 and let the application do the checksumming.
Yes, that's a different way of putting my concern. If you want a proven
file system with checksumming (and an fsck), options are really quite
limited.
> And yes, I would for sure turn such functionality on if it were present.
Same here. I already use page-level checksum with Berkeley DB.
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Ogrisegg | 2012-01-24 09:39:19 | PATCH: pg_basebackup (missing exit on error) |
Previous Message | jesper | 2012-01-24 08:02:28 | Re: Page Checksums |