From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows. |
Date: | 2021-12-09 14:29:12 |
Message-ID: | 82bac95c-aed8-d014-1eb8-6028c2c6da1f@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/9/21 08:35, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 09.12.21 03:44, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:46 AM Andres Freund<andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
>> wrote:
>>> Is it perhaps time to to use unix sockets on windows by default
>>> (i.e. PG_TEST_USE_UNIX_SOCKETS), at least when on a new enough windows?
>
> Makes sense to get this to work, at least as an option.
>
>> Makes sense. As a data point, it looks like this feature is in all
>> supported releases of Windows. It arrived in 1803, already EOL'd, and
>> IIUC even a Windows Server 2016 "LTSC" system that's been disconnected
>> from the internet and refusing all updates reaches "mainstream EOL"
>> next month.
>
> I believe the "18" in "1803" refers to 2018. We have Windows
> buildfarm members that mention 2016 and 2017 in their title. Would
> those be in trouble?
Probably not if they have been updated. I have Windows machines
substantially older that 2018 but now running versions dated later.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-12-09 14:42:19 | Re: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows. |
Previous Message | Himanshu Upadhyaya | 2021-12-09 14:04:37 | Re: SQL/JSON: functions |